British Woman Admits Guilt in Global Monkey Torture Network: The Disturbing Details Unveiled
In a chilling revelation, a British woman from Kidderminster, Holly LeGresley, has pleaded guilty to her role in a worldwide network responsible for commissioning gruesome torture videos involving baby monkeys.
Her actions, revealed after a year-long BBC Eye investigation, demonstrate the sinister reach of the internet’s darkest corners.
LeGresley, 37, operated under the alias “The Immolator,” and was a prominent member of a private Telegram group where she uploaded disturbing content involving the torture of baby monkeys. According to prosecutors, she had shared over 150 images and videos depicting acts of horrific cruelty.
Her role extended beyond passive participation; she actively orchestrated the atrocities by conducting polls in the group to determine the methods of torture inflicted on the vulnerable animals.
Members of this sadistic network, including LeGresley, financed and directed people in Indonesia to capture, maim, and even kill infant long-tailed macaques in videos custom-made to their viewers’ requests.
Their sickening creativity knew no bounds, as they would burn the animals, mutilate them with tools, or even subject them to blenders.
The investigation exposed a web of participants globally. In the United States, Mike Macartney, known as “Torture King,” was identified as the mastermind behind the group. Once a motorcycle gang member and now a convicted criminal, Macartney employed LeGresley as a moderator, leveraging her zeal for cruelty to organize and archive content.
He, along with fellow Americans David Noble and Nicole Devilbiss, faces up to five years in prison.
Authorities were able to identify two additional individuals who orchestrated the suffering: Stacey Storey, known as “Sadistic,” and “Mr. Ape,” whose identity remains hidden for safety concerns.
Law Enforcement’s Response
The British courts quickly mobilized after the BBC’s findings. Kevin Lacks-Kelly, head of the UK’s National Wildlife Crime Unit, noted that LeGresley was central to the network’s operations.
He characterized her involvement as more than mere consumption of content, calling her “unequivocally the worst case” he had ever overseen. Her actions weren’t motivated by money alone; she derived genuine pleasure from the pain inflicted.
Sarah Kite, co-founder of Action for Primates, emphasized the perverse nature of the crimes, describing the brutality as “sickening, something I had never seen previously.”
The network, initially formed on YouTube, migrated to encrypted messaging apps, reflecting a systemic issue. Despite the arrests of LeGresley, Macartney, and several other accomplices worldwide, questions remain on how to combat such crimes effectively.
The pervasive nature of encrypted platforms has enabled these individuals to evade detection for years, and LeGresley’s guilty plea only scratches the surface.
LeGresley will be sentenced on June 7th, while her associate, Adriana Orme, 55, chose not to enter a plea. Orme stands accused of disseminating obscene content and contributing to animal abuse by making a small payment to the network. Both women are out on bail under strict conditions preventing unsupervised contact with children or animals.
Meanwhile, authorities continue to work with their international counterparts. In Indonesia, the police detained Asep Yadi Nurul Hikmah, one of the network’s most brutal torturers, and M. Ajis Rasjana, who were both convicted of animal torture.
This investigation has shown the grotesque capabilities of humanity when driven by twisted desires. The global reach of the internet provides unprecedented challenges for law enforcement, who struggle to keep up with evolving technology and cunning perpetrators.
As LeGresley and her accomplices await sentencing, animal rights activists are left questioning what more can be done to protect these creatures from the internet’s worst predators.
STAY UPDATED
Join our community of keen travellers, wildlife enthusiasts and adventure seekers.
The Flu Is Killing Chimps – Are Tourists To Blame?
When Sniffles Turn Deadly: The Devastating Impact of Human Viruses on Great Apes
In Uganda's Kibale National Park, a normally vibrant community of chimpanzees fell silent. Their telltale chatter, normally heard over the lush forest canopy, was replaced by a grim symphony of coughing and sneezing.
For weeks, the community of 205 chimps seemed engulfed in illness, and the once-vibrant jungle felt unnervingly still. Stella, an adult female chimpanzee, was found freshly dead, presenting a rare opportunity to solve this heartbreaking mystery.
Tony Goldberg, a U.S. wildlife epidemiologist, swiftly arrived to investigate alongside Ugandan veterinarians. What they discovered was both tragic and terrifying: Stella had succumbed to severe pneumonia caused by human metapneumovirus (HMPV), a virus that is usually just a mild cold for us but fatal to our closest primate relatives.
Reverse Zoonoses: A Growing Threat to Great Apes
This cross-species infection phenomenon, known as reverse zoonoses, is becoming a grim reality for many wildlife populations globally. In Kibale, pathogens like HMPV and human rhinovirus C have been leading killers of chimpanzees for decades, responsible for 59% of known deaths. Stella’s community alone saw over 12% of its members perish in one outbreak. For endangered species like chimps, gorillas, and bonobos, already under siege from habitat destruction and poaching, these human-borne illnesses are tipping the scales towards extinction.
“Great ape populations can’t afford these sorts of losses,” warns Goldberg, a researcher at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
“Their populations are already so small, fragmented, and declining that they don’t have the ability to rebound or adapt.”
READ NEXT: Get To Know The Chimpanzee
The Unintended Consequences of Conservation Tourism
Ironically, conservation efforts themselves are implicated in this deadly exchange of pathogens. Great ape tourism, a linchpin of conservation funding that incentivizes locals to protect wildlife, has simultaneously exposed these animals to deadly human illnesses. Even with stringent guidelines like maintaining a 7-meter distance, limiting group sizes, and mandating face masks, the rules are often broken in the field. Excited tourists may disregard safety measures in their rush for the perfect photo, and local guides may look the other way to avoid jeopardizing their tips.
Fabian Leendertz, director of the Helmholtz Institute for One Health in Germany, pointed out that ecotourism brings in crucial revenue for the 13 African countries that offer it, making reverse zoonoses a contentious topic. Efforts to impose stricter regulations are often thwarted by the need to balance economic sustainability with wildlife preservation.
Goldberg noticed a perplexing pattern: the pathogens infecting great apes were the same that children regularly bring home from school, even as asymptomatic adults continue to spread the germs. By comparing nasal swabs from local children, forest workers, and chimpanzee fecal samples, the researchers confirmed their hypothesis: schoolchildren were unknowingly passing these pathogens to adults who then brought them into the forest.
A clear drop in infection rates during Uganda's COVID-19 lockdown further validated the theory that schools are significant transmission sources. “To save the chimps, we have to make kids healthier,” Goldberg emphasizes.
Solutions on the Horizon: Making Conservation Tourism Safe
Efforts to protect great apes from deadly pathogens are underway. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has developed strict guidelines for safe tourism practices. Additional measures include creating paid sick leave for guides, improving handwashing education, and implementing hand-sanitizing stations. Raising awareness of the importance of following biosecurity protocols is also essential.
“We need a deeper understanding of the problem,” says Cristina Gomes, a wildlife conservationist at Florida International University.
“Enforcing biosecurity rules and helping communities understand the stakes will be key.”
The road to safer tourism and healthier ape populations is paved with challenges, but as scientists, officials, and local communities work together, there’s hope that these critical conservation efforts will protect not just the majestic great apes but also their habitats and the local people who rely on them. “Behavioural change takes time, but if we start now, it can happen,” says Patrick Tusiime, a health coordinator in Uganda. Let’s keep these jungles buzzing for generations to come.
First For Wildlife – Orangutan Uses Medicinal Plant To Treat Wound
Ingenious Instincts: The Medical Mastery of Orangutans in the Wild
In the dense, verdant jungles of Sumatra, a remarkable scene unfolds—a Sumatran orangutan, known to researchers as Rakus, tenderly applies a concoction of chewed leaves and sap to a fresh wound on his face.
This isn't just an incidental act of nature but a calculated move of self-medication, showcasing a level of intelligence and adaptability that blurs the line between human and animal ingenuity.
Researchers at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior in Germany, led by Dr. Caroline Schuppli, have observed Rakus utilizing Fibraurea tinctoria, a plant known for its medicinal properties, to treat his wounds. This specific instance involves Rakus chewing the plant's leaves, extracting the sap, and meticulously applying it to a facial wound, believed to have been the result of a confrontation with another male orangutan.
Remarkably, after several applications over days, Rakus's wound visibly healed, leaving behind only a faint scar—a testament to the plant’s efficacy and Rakus’s medicinal prowess.
Dr. Schuppli notes:
"It shows that he, to some extent, has the cognitive capacities that he needs to treat the wound with some medically active plants. But we really don’t know how much he understands."
This behavior provides a rare glimpse into the cognitive abilities of orangutans, suggesting a deeper understanding and purpose behind their actions.
The concept of wound care is ancient, with human practices dating back to 2200 BC. However, Rakus's actions hint at these cognitive capacities existing long before humans documented them, suggesting that our last common ancestor with orangutans might have also possessed similar abilities.
This behavioral trait is not isolated to orangutans; other primates and even some birds have shown the ability to utilize natural resources for self-healing, indicating a widespread evolutionary trait across different species.
The implications of these observations are profound. They not only reshape our understanding of primate intelligence but also offer insights into the evolutionary origins of medicinal knowledge. Such behaviors could potentially point to how early humans might have discovered and developed the use of medicinal plants, inspired by observing animals like Rakus.
Reflecting on Rakus's behavior compels us to consider the deep-rooted connection between all living creatures. It challenges us to rethink how we view animal intelligence, recognizing it not as a hierarchy with humans at the pinnacle but as a spectrum of diverse cognitive abilities.
Conclusion
Rakus's use of medicinal plants is a window into the soul of the animal kingdom—an intimate portrait of the ingenuity and adaptability that define life on Earth.
As we continue to explore these connections, we may find that the line separating human brilliance from animal instinct is not just blurred but altogether non-existent.
Our challenge now is not just to observe but to learn and, ultimately, to protect those who cannot voice their right to exist.
Trophy Hunting Comes Under Fire After Third Bull Elephant ‘Legally’ Killed Within Six Months in Tanzania
An Uneasy Truce Broken: The Resumption of Trophy Hunting and the Fate of Africa's Tuskers
In the quiet stretches of the Amboseli, where the gentle giants of the earth tread, a controversy has brewed, shaking the foundations of wildlife conservation across the borders of Kenya and Tanzania. The recent legal killings of three bull elephants, known as tuskers for their large tusks, signal a disturbing end to a 30-year moratorium aimed at protecting these migratory icons.
This development not only sparks a fervent debate but also poses significant questions about the future of wildlife conservation and the ethical dimensions of trophy hunting.
The first crack in this long-standing truce appeared in September 2023 when a tusker was killed in the Enduimet Wildlife Management Area in northern Tanzania, just a short distance from the Kenya-Tanzania border. This was followed by two more killings, with the most recent incident occurring in late February 2024.
These events have not only startled conservationists but have also ignited a complex discussion about the role of trophy hunting in conservation and the economic frameworks that support it.
The Amboseli elephants, numbering around 2,000, are celebrated not just for their majestic presence but also as a symbol of conservation success. Decades of protection have allowed them to flourish, with the elders of this population playing critical roles as breeders and repositories of knowledge. Cynthia Moss, Director of the Amboseli Trust for Elephants, emphasizes their importance, stating, "Tourists, photographers, and filmmakers travel to Amboseli specifically to see these older males. They are essential to a healthy elephant population."
Yet, the allure of the hunt remains potent. Trophy hunters pay exorbitant fees, with reports suggesting amounts upwards of $250,000 to hunt a 'super-tusker.' This creates a significant economic incentive for local communities and governments. The funds from trophy hunting are often touted as crucial for conservation efforts and for supporting local communities. However, this argument is met with skepticism and resistance by those who believe that the ecological and economic benefits of live elephants far outweigh those obtained through hunting.
The decision to lift the hunting ban was not taken lightly, and it reflects a broader conflict between immediate financial gain and long-term conservation goals. Mbelwa Kairuki, Tanzania’s High Commissioner to the UK, expresses the complexity of the issue, acknowledging that while the incidents have highlighted the divisive nature of trophy hunting, they also underscore the need for rational and inclusive discussions on conservation practices.
The implications of resuming trophy hunting are profound, not just for the elephant population but for the entire ecosystem. The older bulls, like the ones recently killed, are not mere remnants of their species but are pivotal to the genetic and social fabric of elephant populations. Their loss is felt deeply, not just in immediate terms but across generations.
In this context, the challenge for Tanzania and Kenya, and indeed for the global community, is to find a balance that respects both the ecological integrity of wildlife populations and the economic realities of the regions that host them. As this debate unfolds, it becomes clear that the path forward must be paved with careful thought, respecting both the majesty of nature and the needs of human communities.
As we delve into this issue, one cannot help but feel a mix of awe and apprehension. The tuskers of Amboseli, with their grandeur and grace, have roamed these lands for decades. Their plight is not just a regional issue but a global call to action. It challenges us to reflect on our values and responsibilities, urging us to advocate for a world where coexistence and respect for all life forms are paramount.
In essence, the fate of Amboseli's tuskers is a litmus test for humanity's commitment to conservation and ethical stewardship. As this story continues to unfold, it will undoubtedly serve as a critical reference point for discussions on wildlife management, conservation ethics, and the interplay between human and animal welfare on a global stage.
Tourists Rescued As River Floods In Masai Mara
Breaking the Banks: Catastrophe at the Maasai Mara
In the lush expanse of the Maasai Mara, nature's fury has reclaimed the foreground. Recently, torrential rains have wrought havoc across Kenya, transforming serene retreats into scenes of urgency. At the heart of this tempest, over 90 tourists found themselves rescued from the very jaws of disaster, as the iconic Maasai Mara reserve turned into a vast inundated plain.
The Maasai Mara, a name synonymous with the great wildebeest migration, saw more than a dozen of its luxurious lodges and camps swallowed by floodwaters after persistent heavy rains forced a local river to burst its banks. On a fateful Wednesday morning, what was intended to be a haven for wildlife enthusiasts became a perilous water world.
The Kenya Red Cross spearheaded the rescue operations, proving once again to be an indispensable force in times of crisis. The logistical prowess of the Narok county government shone through as they deployed helicopters, ensuring the safe evacuation of stranded tourists from the now submerged accommodations. This action highlighted a swift and decisive response to an overwhelming natural disaster.
However, the flooding is not confined to the Maasai Mara. Across Kenya, a grim tally rises—more than 170 lives lost since mid-March with the onset of the rainy season. The destruction spans flooded urban arteries, collapsed infrastructures, and landslides that have buried hopes and homes alike. In Nairobi, the capital itself hasn't been spared, with main roads temporarily transformed into rivers, forcing closures and rescues in residential areas like Kitengela.
The narrative darkens in the western part of Kenya, in Mai Mahiu, where a river ruthlessly claimed 48 lives after bursting through a tunnel blocked with debris. The aftermath left over 80 individuals missing, a chilling reminder of the river's merciless surge. President William Ruto, recognizing the scale of the calamity, has called in military forces to bolster ongoing search and rescue operations.
Yet, locals voice concerns over the sluggish pace of these efforts, hindered by inadequate equipment and perhaps, a measure of unpreparedness.
Amidst this chaos, a pressing directive has been issued by the government, urging those in flood-prone zones to evacuate. The stakes are monumental, as water levels in two key hydroelectric dams have surged to historic heights, threatening further upheaval.
This string of events paints a grim picture of the challenges posed by climate change and extreme weather patterns. It’s a stark reminder of the vulnerability of even the most idyllic settings and the resilience required to withstand and recover from such natural calamities. For now, the Maasai Mara and other affected areas face a recovery that will require not just immediate relief but long-term strategies to mitigate such disasters in the future.
American Man Accused Of Capturing Wolf And Showing Off Before Killing It
The Dark Side of Wildlife Policy: A Deep Dive into Wyoming's Wolf Controversy
Wyoming's breathtaking landscapes and untamed wilderness draw millions of tourists yearly, yet beneath the scenic vistas lies a contentious issue of wildlife management that has recently captured national attention. The state’s handling of gray wolves, highlighted by a recent shocking incident, calls into question the balance between human activities and wildlife conservation.
In February, near the small town of Daniel, Wyoming, an appalling act was committed against a gray wolf—a creature emblematic of the American West's rugged and wild spirit.
The accused, whose actions were deplorably captured and circulated on social media, allegedly ran down the wolf with a snowmobile, bound its mouth, paraded it at a local bar, and then proceeded to kill it.
This incident has not only sparked outrage but has also ignited a broader conversation about Wyoming's wildlife policies.
Wyoming’s “Predator Zone” and the Controversy of Lax Laws
Wyoming divides its jurisdiction into two distinct zones when it comes to wolf management: the northwestern protected area, which includes national parks where wolves are a major tourist draw, and the vast "predator zone" covering 85% of the state. In this latter area, wolves can be killed without many restrictions. The rationale for such a division stems from an agreement made years ago where federal compensation for livestock lost to wolf predation was traded for more lenient killing permissions in the predator zone. This has long been a subject of legal battles and ethical debates.
The recent incident occurred within this predator zone, but critics argue that labeling it as an isolated case misses the broader implications of such policies. While state officials, including Jim Magagna, executive vice president of the Wyoming Stock Growers Association, argue that the laws are designed to protect livestock from wolf predation without impacting the overall wolf population, this incident has undeniably put the state's management strategies under the microscope.
Economic and Environmental Balances
Wyoming's approach to wolf management is often justified by the economic impact that wolves can have on individual ranchers. Although wolves' impact on livestock is statistically minor, with losses in the predator zone amounting to only 0.002% of cattle herds, the emotional and financial toll on affected ranchers can be significant.
However, environmentalists and animal rights advocates contend that the freedom to kill wolves in most of the state leads to unnecessary cruelty and can destabilize the ecological balance, affecting other wildlife and the health of ecosystems.
The ethical considerations of wildlife management are complex. Saharai Salazar, a Californian who planned to marry in Wyoming, embodies the public's growing unease, shifting her wedding venue in response to the incident and advocating for legislative changes to protect wildlife. Her story is just one of many reverberating across social media, where a hashtag calling for a boycott of Wyoming tourism has gained traction.
The Need for Reform
The conversation about wolf management in Wyoming is indicative of a larger national debate about how we coexist with native wildlife. As Ed Bangs, a former U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wolf biologist, notes, while the predator zone policies are unlikely to endanger the overall wolf population, they do raise important questions about our moral responsibilities and the long-term sustainability of our environmental policies.
As the legal and social battles unfold, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the need for continual reassessment of our wildlife policies, ensuring they align not only with ecological and economic needs but also with ethical standards. Wyoming, with its rich natural heritage, stands at a crossroads, challenged to redefine its relationship with the land and its creatures.
The hope is for a balanced approach that respects both the rights of landowners and the sanctity of wildlife—a true test of our commitment to conservation and coexistence.