Blue whale numbers are on the rise, as the species makes an incredible fight back against extinction.
The British Antarctic Survey (BAS) has found an ‘unprecedented’ amount of the whales in South Georgia after recent years saw a 97% decrease in their numbers.
Whale project leader Dr Jennifer Jackson, a whale ecologist at BAS, said:
After three years of surveys, we are thrilled to see so many whales visiting South Georgia to feed again. This is a place where both whaling and sealing were carried out extensively.
It is clear that protection from whaling has worked, with humpback whales now seen at densities similar to those a century earlier, when whaling first began at South Georgia.
Blue whales have long been hunted for their sought after blubber, baleen and meat, which saw 176,000 killed in just 60 years.
In 1986, commercial whaling was banned by the International Whaling Commission (IWC), which has evidently helped the species grow in number.
In 2018 only a single blue whale was spotted during a BAS survey, however this year’s survey saw an optimistic 36 separate sightings, with 55 individual blue whales sighted. Blue whales can grow up to a whopping 98 feet in length, so it’s safe to say they shouldn’t be too difficult to spot.
On a sadder note, despite a 30-year ongoing commercial whaling ban in place, countries like Norway, Japan and Iceland still continued to undertake it and have lodged official objections to the ban.
They claimed they continued it for for scientific purposes, but Iceland officially resumed its commercial whaling back in 2006.
The WWF reported that more than 31,000 whales have been killed by countries who continued whaling since the ban (also known as the moratorium) came into place.
However, despite having what’s known as a scientific permit for whaling, the WWF argues Norway and Japan did it for ‘politics, not science’.
It said:
Under another provision of the International Convention on the Regulation of Whaling, some nations have continued to hunt whales using the “scientific permit” exception.
This system allows nations to grant their whalers permits to conduct scientific studies, with the express understanding that the whales taken should be “processed” “so far as practicable”. In this way, whales may be taken and their meat and products commercially sold. Accusations have been made that Japan is using scientific permits as a way around the moratorium.
[…] These countries claim that the catches are essential to obtain necessary information for research and future cetacean management.
Despite having a scientific permit, in June 2019 Japan announced it was also officially resuming commercial whaling.
According to the BBC, Japan’s whaling ships had a permit to catch 227 minke, Bryde’s and sei whales last year in Japanese waters.
Upon resuming commercial whaling, Japan removed itself from the IWC, meaning it no longer needed to abide by their rules.
Japan has long argued it is possible to hunt whales in a sustainable way, despite species like the blue whale being classed as critically endangered.
SOURCE: UNILAD
STAY UPDATED
Join our community of keen travellers, wildlife enthusiasts and adventure seekers.
Tourists Rescued As River Floods In Masai Mara
May 2, 2024
Breaking the Banks: Catastrophe at the Maasai Mara
In the lush expanse of the Maasai Mara, nature's fury has reclaimed the foreground. Recently, torrential rains have wrought havoc across Kenya, transforming serene retreats into scenes of urgency. At the heart of this tempest, over 90 tourists found themselves rescued from the very jaws of disaster, as the iconic Maasai Mara reserve turned into a vast inundated plain.
The Maasai Mara, a name synonymous with the great wildebeest migration, saw more than a dozen of its luxurious lodges and camps swallowed by floodwaters after persistent heavy rains forced a local river to burst its banks. On a fateful Wednesday morning, what was intended to be a haven for wildlife enthusiasts became a perilous water world.
The Kenya Red Cross spearheaded the rescue operations, proving once again to be an indispensable force in times of crisis. The logistical prowess of the Narok county government shone through as they deployed helicopters, ensuring the safe evacuation of stranded tourists from the now submerged accommodations. This action highlighted a swift and decisive response to an overwhelming natural disaster.
However, the flooding is not confined to the Maasai Mara. Across Kenya, a grim tally rises—more than 170 lives lost since mid-March with the onset of the rainy season. The destruction spans flooded urban arteries, collapsed infrastructures, and landslides that have buried hopes and homes alike. In Nairobi, the capital itself hasn't been spared, with main roads temporarily transformed into rivers, forcing closures and rescues in residential areas like Kitengela.
The narrative darkens in the western part of Kenya, in Mai Mahiu, where a river ruthlessly claimed 48 lives after bursting through a tunnel blocked with debris. The aftermath left over 80 individuals missing, a chilling reminder of the river's merciless surge. President William Ruto, recognizing the scale of the calamity, has called in military forces to bolster ongoing search and rescue operations.
Yet, locals voice concerns over the sluggish pace of these efforts, hindered by inadequate equipment and perhaps, a measure of unpreparedness.
Amidst this chaos, a pressing directive has been issued by the government, urging those in flood-prone zones to evacuate. The stakes are monumental, as water levels in two key hydroelectric dams have surged to historic heights, threatening further upheaval.
This string of events paints a grim picture of the challenges posed by climate change and extreme weather patterns. It’s a stark reminder of the vulnerability of even the most idyllic settings and the resilience required to withstand and recover from such natural calamities. For now, the Maasai Mara and other affected areas face a recovery that will require not just immediate relief but long-term strategies to mitigate such disasters in the future.
20 Stunning Tiger Photographs from Wildlife Photography Competition
May 1, 2024
Tiger Conservation and the Impact of Wildlife Photography
In the dimming light of the world's wild landscapes, the tiger moves with a silken grace, each step a testament to a legacy both ancient and increasingly threatened.
The "Remembering Wildlife" photography competition, a prestigious annual event, recently showcased 20 stunning images of tigers, each one capturing the stark beauty and raw survival of these magnificent creatures. But beyond their aesthetic allure, these images serve a deeper purpose: they are a clarion call for conservation.
A Portrait of Peril
There are only around 5,500 tigers left in the wild, and the big cat is listed as 'endangered' by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
This stark statistic underpins the urgent narrative of tiger conservation. The dwindling numbers highlight a story of habitat loss, human-wildlife conflict, and illegal poaching that has left these majestic animals teetering on the brink of survival.
The Power of an Image
Photography, especially in the context of wildlife and conservation, does more than just document reality. It evokes emotion, provokes thought, and can drive action. The images from the "Remembering Wildlife" competition, set to be featured in the forthcoming book "Remembering Tigers," do just that.
They are not merely portraits but powerful tools in the fight for conservation. As we gaze into the eyes of these tigers through the lens of the world's best wildlife photographers, we are reminded of what is at stake.
The Winning Images:
Voices of Conservation
"The raw power and solemn dignity captured in these images remind us of our duty to these creatures," notes Dr. Jane Goodall, a primatologist and a fervent advocate for endangered species.
The photography serves as a poignant reminder of the beauty we stand to lose and the scientific and ethical imperatives to preserve it.
Tiger conservation is multifaceted, involving habitat protection, anti-poaching efforts, and community engagement. Countries like India, home to the largest number of wild tigers, have implemented successful conservation programs that have seen tiger populations begin to stabilize and even grow. The Global Tiger Forum, an inter-governmental international body, plays a crucial role in this by promoting the agenda of tiger conservation.
Conservation efforts also extend to improving the genetic diversity of tigers, combatting the illegal wildlife trade, and ensuring sustainable landscapes for their survival. Organizations like the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and local NGOs work tirelessly to mitigate human-tiger conflicts and promote coexistence.
READ NEXT; THE BEST PLACES TO SEE TIGERS IN INDIA
Despite these efforts, challenges abound. Habitat fragmentation, human encroachment, and climate change pose significant threats to tiger populations. Conservationists argue for a landscape approach to conservation, connecting protected areas and providing safe corridors for wildlife movement.
In addition, engaging local communities in conservation efforts is essential. By involving those who live closest to these creatures in the protection efforts, there is hope for a sustainable coexistence. "Community-led initiatives are crucial in the fight against poaching and habitat destruction," states a conservation expert from the field.
As we reflect on the stunning images from the "Remembering Wildlife" competition, let us not forget the underlying message they carry. Each photograph is not just a moment captured in time but a part of a larger story—a story that requires us to act, to care, and to participate in the conservation of our planet's remarkable wildlife.
Through informed discussion, dedicated conservation efforts, and a sustained will to change, we can hope to see a future where tigers continue to roam free in the wild. Let these images be a reminder and a motivation, for there is much work to be done, and the stakes are nothing less than the survival of one of the Earth's most iconic species.
How A Turtle’s Suffering Launched a War on Plastic Straws
May 1, 2024
Rethinking Plastic: The Last Straw That Broke the Turtle’s Back
In 2015, a heart-wrenching video surfaced that would soon ripple across the globe, stirring an unprecedented environmental awakening. It featured a distressed olive ridley turtle, with a plastic straw lodged deeply in its nostril.
This video, captured by marine biologist Christine Figgener during a research trip off the Pacific Coast of Costa Rica, did more than just showcase the plight of a single marine creature; it ignited a worldwide campaign against plastic straws, urging people to reconsider their everyday plastic consumption habits.
The Incident That Sparked a Movement
The day was as ordinary as any in the field for Christine and her team. Their mission was simple—study and protect sea turtles—but what they encountered that day was anything but. The team spotted an unusual obstruction in a turtle’s nose, and upon closer examination, it turned out to be a common plastic straw.
The removal process, painstaking and bloody, was filmed by Figgener. The video, slightly over eight minutes long, captured the brutal reality faced by marine life due to human disregard for the environment. Upon its release on social media, the video instantly went viral, shared and watched by millions around the world, its raw and unfiltered nature opening the eyes of the public to the dire consequences of plastic pollution.
The Science of Plastic Pollution
Plastic pollution has long been a scourge of the marine environment, impacting wildlife and ecosystems at an alarming rate. The statistics are stark—scientists estimate that over 8 billion kilograms of plastic waste enter the oceans each year, a number that only scratches the surface of the broader environmental degradation.
Marine animals, from the smallest plankton to the largest whales, are known to ingest plastic debris, mistaking it for food. This can lead to blockages, starvation, and ultimately, death. The video of the turtle highlighted this issue in a visceral way, connecting scientific data with the tangible agony of a living creature. It underscored a critical message: the abstract numbers and studies often cited in academic circles needed a relatable face to truly resonate with the general public and spur change.
Public Reaction and Media Influence
The impact of Figgener's video was amplified by its viral nature, which transcended geographical and cultural barriers to ignite a global conversation. Media outlets around the world picked up the story, each iteration highlighting the agony of the affected turtle and by extension, the silent suffering of countless other marine creatures.
Social platforms buzzed with discussions, shares, and retweets, each post increasing public awareness and sensitivity to the issue of plastic pollution. This widespread media coverage did not just raise awareness; it galvanized a collective call to action.
Educational institutions, environmental organizations, and influencers leveraged the video as a powerful teaching tool to illustrate the broader implications of disposable plastics on marine ecosystems.
The Rise of Anti-Plastic Campaigns
Spurred by the overwhelming public and media response, grassroots campaigns and large-scale movements against plastic pollution gained significant momentum. "The Last Plastic Straw" initiative, founded by Jackie Nuñez in 2011, experienced a surge in support, symbolizing a shift in public attitudes towards plastic use.
Across the globe, similar campaigns sprouted, each drawing inspiration from the distressing scenes in the video. These movements focused on reducing the reliance on single-use plastics, starting with straws but quickly expanding to include plastic bags, bottles, and packaging.
The campaigns varied in approach—some advocating for outright bans, others promoting alternatives such as metal, glass, or bamboo straws, and many educating the public on the importance of personal responsibility in environmental stewardship.
Legislative and Corporate Responses
The real testament to the video's impact was the swift legislative and corporate response that followed. Governments worldwide, prompted by public outcry and armed with undeniable visual evidence of the harm caused by plastic waste, began to implement stricter regulations on plastic use.
Over 30 countries have enacted some form of ban on single-use plastic items since 2015, reflecting a growing global consensus on the need for environmental regulation. Corporations, too, felt the pressure to adapt. Notable companies such as Starbucks, McDonald's, and Alaska Airlines announced plans to phase out plastic straws and other single-use plastics, replacing them with more sustainable alternatives.
These policy shifts and corporate changes signified a pivotal moment in the fight against plastic pollution, illustrating the power of public engagement driven by compelling visual storytelling.
The Effectiveness of Targeting Single-Use Plastics
While the campaign against plastic straws has symbolized the fight against plastic pollution, it also raised questions about the focus on this particular single-use item. Critics argue that while targeting straws may raise awareness, it potentially overshadows larger issues such as plastic packaging, the largest contributor to plastic waste. Nonetheless, the "straw ban" serves as a gateway to broader discussions about sustainable living and the necessity for comprehensive waste management solutions.
This targeted approach has proved effective in introducing the public to concepts of reduction and recycling, making it a valuable stepping stone in the broader environmental movement. The effectiveness of such campaigns is evident in the shift in consumer behavior and the growing popularity of reusable products, demonstrating a clear change in societal norms and values towards sustainability.
Despite the progress made, the fight against plastic pollution is far from over. Plastic consumption globally continues to rise, outpacing efforts to mitigate its environmental impact. The complexity of plastic recycling, coupled with economic incentives to produce virgin plastic, presents significant challenges.
Looking forward, the movement sparked by the turtle video must evolve into more comprehensive environmental strategies. These include enhancing recycling technologies, developing new biodegradable materials, and continuing to shift public and corporate behavior towards sustainability. International cooperation and stringent environmental policies will be crucial in addressing the global scale of plastic pollution.
The draft resolution by UN Member States to end plastic pollution by 2024 is a promising step, reflecting an international commitment to tackling this issue with the seriousness it demands.
The narrative of the turtle and the straw has inspired countless individuals to take action. From schoolchildren leading local beach clean-ups to entrepreneurs developing sustainable products, the ripple effects of the video are profound.
Spotlighting these personal stories not only humanizes the issue but also reinforces the impact that individual actions can have on global challenges.
Activists like Stephanie Muttillo, who successfully petitioned major corporations to change their policies, exemplify how grassroots activism can influence larger corporate practices and contribute to global environmental change.
The story of the distressed turtle has transcended its origins as a viral video to become a symbol of the environmental challenges and opportunities facing our global community. It serves as a poignant reminder that change often starts with a single, impactful moment—an image, a video, a narrative that touches hearts and stirs minds.
This story has undoubtedly been a catalyst for change, sparking a significant shift in how we view and handle plastic waste. As we continue to navigate the complexities of environmental conservation, the lessons learned from this movement will undoubtedly influence future strategies and inspire continued efforts to safeguard our planet.
Watch the full video here:
American Man Accused Of Capturing Wolf And Showing Off Before Killing It
May 1, 2024
The Dark Side of Wildlife Policy: A Deep Dive into Wyoming's Wolf Controversy
Wyoming's breathtaking landscapes and untamed wilderness draw millions of tourists yearly, yet beneath the scenic vistas lies a contentious issue of wildlife management that has recently captured national attention. The state’s handling of gray wolves, highlighted by a recent shocking incident, calls into question the balance between human activities and wildlife conservation.
In February, near the small town of Daniel, Wyoming, an appalling act was committed against a gray wolf—a creature emblematic of the American West's rugged and wild spirit.
The accused, whose actions were deplorably captured and circulated on social media, allegedly ran down the wolf with a snowmobile, bound its mouth, paraded it at a local bar, and then proceeded to kill it.
This incident has not only sparked outrage but has also ignited a broader conversation about Wyoming's wildlife policies.
Wyoming’s “Predator Zone” and the Controversy of Lax Laws
Wyoming divides its jurisdiction into two distinct zones when it comes to wolf management: the northwestern protected area, which includes national parks where wolves are a major tourist draw, and the vast "predator zone" covering 85% of the state. In this latter area, wolves can be killed without many restrictions. The rationale for such a division stems from an agreement made years ago where federal compensation for livestock lost to wolf predation was traded for more lenient killing permissions in the predator zone. This has long been a subject of legal battles and ethical debates.
The recent incident occurred within this predator zone, but critics argue that labeling it as an isolated case misses the broader implications of such policies. While state officials, including Jim Magagna, executive vice president of the Wyoming Stock Growers Association, argue that the laws are designed to protect livestock from wolf predation without impacting the overall wolf population, this incident has undeniably put the state's management strategies under the microscope.
Economic and Environmental Balances
Wyoming's approach to wolf management is often justified by the economic impact that wolves can have on individual ranchers. Although wolves' impact on livestock is statistically minor, with losses in the predator zone amounting to only 0.002% of cattle herds, the emotional and financial toll on affected ranchers can be significant.
However, environmentalists and animal rights advocates contend that the freedom to kill wolves in most of the state leads to unnecessary cruelty and can destabilize the ecological balance, affecting other wildlife and the health of ecosystems.
The ethical considerations of wildlife management are complex. Saharai Salazar, a Californian who planned to marry in Wyoming, embodies the public's growing unease, shifting her wedding venue in response to the incident and advocating for legislative changes to protect wildlife. Her story is just one of many reverberating across social media, where a hashtag calling for a boycott of Wyoming tourism has gained traction.
The Need for Reform
The conversation about wolf management in Wyoming is indicative of a larger national debate about how we coexist with native wildlife. As Ed Bangs, a former U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wolf biologist, notes, while the predator zone policies are unlikely to endanger the overall wolf population, they do raise important questions about our moral responsibilities and the long-term sustainability of our environmental policies.
As the legal and social battles unfold, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the need for continual reassessment of our wildlife policies, ensuring they align not only with ecological and economic needs but also with ethical standards. Wyoming, with its rich natural heritage, stands at a crossroads, challenged to redefine its relationship with the land and its creatures.
The hope is for a balanced approach that respects both the rights of landowners and the sanctity of wildlife—a true test of our commitment to conservation and coexistence.
At Least 26 Dead After Mass Pilot Whale Stranding In Australia
April 30, 2024
Unraveling the Mystery of Australia's Mass Whale Strandings
Under the blazing sun of Western Australia, the shores of Toby Inlet in Geographe Bay became a somber scene last Thursday as a pod of 160 long-finned pilot whales found themselves ensnared in the shallow waters.
As the local community and wildlife teams rallied together in a desperate rescue attempt, this incident adds yet another chapter to the perplexing phenomenon of mass whale strandings—a phenomenon that continues to puzzle scientists and tug at the heartstrings of animal lovers worldwide.
The mass stranding occurred less than 250 kilometers south of Perth, covering a span of approximately 500 meters of shoreline. Local authorities, along with scores of volunteers, worked tirelessly to aid these majestic creatures, striving to shepherd them back to the safety of deeper waters.
Despite their efforts, at least 26 of these whales succumbed to the ordeal. Pia Courtis, a spokesperson for the Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions, remarked on the tragic nature of these events and the community's spirited response to help these marine giants.
There are a further 20 whales in a pod about 1.5km offshore. Another pod of about 110 animals are together closer offshore. https://t.co/H26PrW3f2o
— Shark Safety WA (@SharkSafetyWA) April 25, 2024
The Science Behind the Stranding
Pilot whales, known for their strong social structures, often follow their podmates, even if it leads them into danger. This characteristic is believed to contribute significantly to the frequency of their strandings. "They're highly sociable creatures, which can sometimes be their downfall," explains marine biologist Dr. Helena Grant. "If one or two whales venture too close to shore, it’s likely the entire pod will follow."
Research suggests various potential causes for these strandings, including navigational errors, viral pathogens, or even disturbances from underwater noise pollution due to human activities, which can disorient the whales' sensitive sonar navigation. While definitive answers elude the scientific community, each stranding provides critical data to help unravel this mystery.
Recurrent Tragedy
Mass strandings are not new to Australia or its neighbor, New Zealand, with notable incidents recorded over decades.
The largest recorded stranding in Western Australia before this was in Dunsborough in 1996, where 320 long-finned pilot whales beached themselves, and a significant rescue effort managed to save nearly all but 20.
These recurring events underline a grim reality and a pressing need for research and preventive strategies.
The immediate effects of such strandings are heartbreakingly visible on the beaches but extend far beyond the physical location. Economically, they mobilize significant resources for rescue efforts and subsequent scientific studies.
Ecologically, they impact marine biodiversity and can disrupt local marine environments. Socially, they stir local and international communities, drawing volunteers and media attention, which helps raise awareness but also necessitates careful management to ensure the well-being of both the whales and human participants in rescue efforts.
As we witness these gentle giants struggle on our shores, it's a stark reminder of the intricate connection between human activities and marine life. Each stranding event, while tragic, pushes us to reflect on our environmental responsibilities and the urgent need to address global marine health issues. It’s a call to action for not just conservationists but all of us, as stewards of the planet, to foster a more sustainable coexistence with the natural world.
The mass stranding of pilot whales in Western Australia serves as a poignant reminder of our enduring challenge in understanding and protecting marine life. As investigations continue and researchers gather more data, one can only hope that these tragic events become a catalyst for change and a deeper understanding of the delicate balance that governs our oceans.
Until then, the community's spirit in responding to these incidents continues to reflect our collective passion and commitment to preserving our marine counterparts.